Woodward v. Emulex Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Woodward v. Emulex Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 714 F.3d 632
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 21, 2013·No. 12-1612·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 12-1612

FRANK WOODWARD,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

EMULEX CORPORATION and JEFF HOOGENBOOM,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 18, 2013 is amended as follows:

Page 8, line 5: "26(b)(C)(ii)" is corrected to "26(b)(2)(C)(iii)".

Page 11, line 8: "non-discriminatory" is corrected to "nondiscriminatory".

Page 17, line 5: "and" is corrected to "[and]".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodward v. Emulex Corporation, (1st Cir. 2013).

Woodward v. Emulex Corporation (Woodward v. Emulex Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.