Woodward v. Crider

141 S.E. 76, 165 Ga. 407, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 412
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 17, 1927
DocketNo. 6009
StatusPublished

This text of 141 S.E. 76 (Woodward v. Crider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodward v. Crider, 141 S.E. 76, 165 Ga. 407, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 412 (Ga. 1927).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The evidence, in the light of the admission of plaintiff made in judieio, with all reasonable inferences and deductions therefrom, demanded a verdict for the defendant. It was therefore not error for the court so to direct. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Julian Chambers and Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein, for plaintiff. Mitchell & Mitchell, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 S.E. 76, 165 Ga. 407, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-crider-ga-1927.