Woodward v. Chester

4 N.W. 167, 42 Mich. 461, 1880 Mich. LEXIS 675
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 13, 1880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A record bas been furnished us in this case, and also a brief on the part of the defendants. The complainant has not sent in any brief, nor has he appeared either in person or by counsel.

We cannot under such circumstances examine the case on the merits, and it follows that the decree must be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodward v. Chester, 4 N.W. 167, 42 Mich. 461, 1880 Mich. LEXIS 675 (Mich. 1880).

4 N.W. 167 (Woodward v. Chester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grevnin v. Grevnin
29 N.W.2d 263 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1947)