Woodward v. Auyong
34 Haw. 311, 1937 Haw. LEXIS 23
This text of 34 Haw. 311 (Woodward v. Auyong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Woodward v. Auyong, 34 Haw. 311, 1937 Haw. LEXIS 23 (haw 1937).
Opinion
The motion of plaintiff-appellee to dismiss appellant’s bill of exceptions herein is denied under the *312 authorities of Keltz v. Cereal & Fruit Products, Limited, ante, p. 242, and De Mello v. Board of Water Supply, 33 Haw. 133.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mello v. Board of Water Supply
33 Haw. 133 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Haw. 311, 1937 Haw. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-auyong-haw-1937.