Woodward v. Auyong
34 Haw. 311, 1937 Haw. LEXIS 23
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Woodward v. Auyong. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Haw. 810 →
Opinion
The motion of plaintiff-appellee to dismiss appellant’s bill of exceptions herein is denied under the *312 authorities of Keltz v. Cereal & Fruit Products, Limited, ante, p. 242, and De Mello v. Board of Water Supply, 33 Haw. 133.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodward v. Auyong, 34 Haw. 311, 1937 Haw. LEXIS 23 (haw 1937).
34 Haw. 311 (Woodward v. Auyong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mello v. Board of Water Supply
33 Haw. 133 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1934)