Woodward Lumber Co. v. Watson, Vansant & Co.
This text of 68 S.E. 622 (Woodward Lumber Co. v. Watson, Vansant & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. An answer in behalf of a corporation by its bookkeeper who answers positively to the facts therein stated is sufficient, and the striking of such an answer because not made and verified by the corporation was erroneous. Walker v. Swift Fertilizer Works, 3 Ga. App. 283 (59 S. E. 850).
2. A garnishee in his answer admitting indebtedness may set up that the amount of indebtedness admitted is exempt from process of garnishment, because it is wages due to a daily laborer; and where the exemption is so set up, the court can not, in the absence of any traverse, render judgment against the garnishee. Walker v. Swift Fertilizer Co., supra; Pioneer Co-operative Co. v. Eagle & Phoenix Mfg. Co., 67 Ga. 38; Emmons v. Southern Bell Tel. Co., 80 Ga. 760 (7 S. E. 232).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 S.E. 622, 8 Ga. App. 114, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-lumber-co-v-watson-vansant-co-gactapp-1910.