Woodward Cotton Co. v. City of Woodward
232 U.S. 716, 34 S. Ct. 331, 58 L. Ed. 812, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 945
Opinion
Per Curiam. Affirmed on the authority of Madera Water Works Company v. Madera, 228 U. S. 454; Memphis v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Company, 218 U. S. 624; Knoxville Water Company v. City of Knoxville, 200 U. S. 22, and Bienville Water Works Company v. City of Mobile, 175 U. S. 109, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodward Cotton Co. v. City of Woodward, 232 U.S. 716, 34 S. Ct. 331, 58 L. Ed. 812, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 945 (1914).
232 U.S. 716 (Woodward Cotton Co. v. City of Woodward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bienville Water Supply Co. v. Mobile
175 U.S. 109 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Knoxville Water Co. v. Knoxville
200 U.S. 22 (Supreme Court, 1906)
City of Memphis v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
218 U.S. 624 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Madera Water Works v. Madera
228 U.S. 454 (Supreme Court, 1913)