Woodview Villa, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Woodview Villa, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

212 N.E.2d 542, 16 N.Y.2d 961, 265 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1118

DecidedOctober 21, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 212 N.E.2d 542 (Woodview Villa, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodview Villa, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 212 N.E.2d 542, 16 N.Y.2d 961, 265 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1118 (N.Y. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Reargument ordered. Case set down for reargument during the November, 1965 session of the Court of Appeals. The court requests from the counsel for the parties oral argument and briefs on these questions: (1) What are the obligations of the carrier under an insurance policy like this one when the injured party does not appear at the New York workmen’s compensation hearings or present to the board any claim or proof of industrial disability or medical expense! (2) Did claimant effectively waive the rights she may have had under the New York Workmen’s Compensation Act! (3) What contractual duties, if any, to plaintiff did this defendant violate! The Attorney-General, as attorney for the Workmen’s Compensation Board, is requested to file and to serve on the parties a brief or such other statement as he may be advised as to any of these issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reargument ordered. Case set down for reargument during the November, 1965 session of the Court of Appeals. The court requests from the counsel for the parties oral argument and briefs on these questions: (1) What are the obligations of the carrier under an insurance policy like this one when the injured party does not appear at the New York workmen’s compensation hearings or present to the board any claim or proof of industrial disability or medical expense! (2) Did claimant effectively waive the rights she may have had under the New York Workmen’s Compensation Act! (3) What contractual duties, if any, to plaintiff did this defendant violate! The Attorney-General, as attorney for the Workmen’s Compensation Board, is requested to file and to serve on the parties a brief or such other statement as he may be advised as to any of these issues.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 N.E.2d 542, 16 N.Y.2d 961, 265 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodview-villa-inc-v-new-amsterdam-casualty-co-ny-1965.