Woodstock v. Hartford Faience Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Woodstock v. Hartford Faience Co.

259 A.2d 648, 158 Conn. 665

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 5, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted. Since the verdict was set aside, a new trial is necessary.

Philip 8. Walker, for the appellee (defendant). William F. Gallagher, with whom was Howard B. Field III, for the appellant (plaintiff). Argued December 2 decided December 5, 1969

The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted. Since the verdict was set aside, a new trial is necessary.

Philip 8. Walker, for the appellee (defendant). William F. Gallagher, with whom was Howard B. Field III, for the appellant (plaintiff). Argued December 2 decided December 5, 1969

The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.

Woodstock v. Hartford Faience Co., 259 A.2d 648, 158 Conn. 665 (Colo. 1969).

Pincite

259 A.2d 648 (Woodstock v. Hartford Faience Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related