Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Woodson v. State

Woodson v. State

223 So. 3d 1023, 2017 WL 672133, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2284
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2017
DocketCASE NO. 1D15-5630
StatusPublished

This text of 223 So. 3d 1023 (Woodson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodson v. State, 223 So. 3d 1023, 2017 WL 672133, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2284 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence in all respects but one. We reverse the imposition of a $1,050 fine and a $52.50 surcharge, neither of which was pronounced at the sentencing hearing. See Nix v. State, 84 So.3d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Williams v. State, 82 So.3d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). As in Nix, “[o]n remand, the trial court may reimpose the fíne and surcharge after providing notice to Appellant and following the proper procedure.” 84 So.3d at 426.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, C.J., and JAY and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
82 So. 3d 186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Nix v. State
84 So. 3d 424 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 So. 3d 1023, 2017 WL 672133, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodson-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.