Woodson v. Johns
This text of 3 Va. 230 (Woodson v. Johns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The president pronounced the Court’s opinion, “ that the said judgment is erroneous; 1st. Because the security in a bond for the prosecution of an injunction, is not liable for the costs and damages which may accrue on an appeal to a Superior Court ; 2dly. Because the defendant, neither in his declaration, nor in his assignment of breaches of the condition of the bond, demanded such costs and damages ; and. 3dly. Because no such damages on the affirmance of a decree [232]*232in Chancery, were allowed at law, at the time of executing the said bond.'
Judgment reversed, and new trial directed, “ on which trial the jury is to be instructed according to this opinion.”
Sec Rev. Code, vol. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Va. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodson-v-johns-va-1812.