Woodson v. Huppenthal

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2008·No. 08-6644·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6644

JAMES GILBERT WOODSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J.D. HUPPENTHAL, Administrator; PRIMECARE MEDICAL; KIM BROWNING, Head Nurse; WV REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY; OFFICER HINDSON, Corrections Officer, Retired,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00141)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Gilbert Woodson, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia; Joseph Dustin Dillard, John Dorsey Hoffman, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH & BONASSO, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Mark William Browning, David L. Shuman, Sr., SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

James Gilbert Woodson appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodson

v. Huppenthal, No. 5:07-cv-00141 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodson v. Huppenthal, (4th Cir. 2008).

Woodson v. Huppenthal (Woodson v. Huppenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related