Woodson v. Huppenthal
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6644
JAMES GILBERT WOODSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J.D. HUPPENTHAL, Administrator; PRIMECARE MEDICAL; KIM BROWNING, Head Nurse; WV REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY; OFFICER HINDSON, Corrections Officer, Retired,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00141)
Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Gilbert Woodson, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia; Joseph Dustin Dillard, John Dorsey Hoffman, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH & BONASSO, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Mark William Browning, David L. Shuman, Sr., SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
James Gilbert Woodson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodson
v. Huppenthal, No. 5:07-cv-00141 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodson v. Huppenthal (Woodson v. Huppenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.