Woodside v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Woodside v. State

661 So. 2d 140, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10946, 1995 WL 610603

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 18, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2637

StatusPublished

This text of 661 So. 2d 140 (Woodside v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodside v. State, 661 So. 2d 140, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10946, 1995 WL 610603 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant to thirty years imprisonment for “resisting an officer with violence” because that offense is a third degree felony with a habitual offender statutory maximum sentence of ten years imprisonment.

Accordingly, this cause must be remanded to the trial court for re-sentencing consistent [141]*141with the applicable statutory provisions. See Golden v. State, 603 So.2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI