Woodside v. State

661 So. 2d 140, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10946, 1995 WL 610603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 1995·No. No. 94-2637·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant to thirty years imprisonment for “resisting an officer with violence” because that offense is a third degree felony with a habitual offender statutory maximum sentence of ten years imprisonment.

Accordingly, this cause must be remanded to the trial court for re-sentencing consistent [141] with the applicable statutory provisions. See Golden v. State, 603 So.2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodside v. State, 661 So. 2d 140, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10946, 1995 WL 610603 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

661 So. 2d 140 (Woodside v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Golden v. State
603 So. 2d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)