Woods v. Young
This text of 30 F. Cas. 536 (Woods v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
refused a continuafiee, because the plaintiff had not taken or moved for an attachment against his witness, John Wood, who lived at Port Tobacco, out of the District of Columbia, and within one hundred miles of this place; not having decided yet that an attachment will not lie for a witness who resides out of the district, and within one hundred miles. See Voss v. Luke [Case No. 17,014]; Park v. Willis [Id. 10,71,6], November term, 1800.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 F. Cas. 536, 1 Cranch 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-young-circtddc-1806.