Woods v. WILLIAMS & SON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
735 N.W.2d 240, 479 Mich. 862
This text of 735 N.W.2d 240 (Woods v. WILLIAMS & SON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Woods v. WILLIAMS & SON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC., 735 N.W.2d 240, 479 Mich. 862 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Rosa WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WILLIAMS & SON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC., Rick Williams, a/k/a Recardo Williams, and Theodis Thomas, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
735 N.W.2d 240, 479 Mich. 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-williams-son-plumbing-heating-inc-mich-2007.