Woods v. Viosca

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Woods v. Viosca

26 La. Ann. 716

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 15, 1874

DocketNo. 2396

StatusPublished

This text of 26 La. Ann. 716 (Woods v. Viosca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woods v. Viosca, 26 La. Ann. 716 (La. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Wyly, J.

In this suit on a promissory note, there was judgment against the maker thereof, J. Yiosca, Jr., and he has appealed. The plea of Ksjsendens is not well founded. The plaintiff is not shown to have acquired the note from the payee after maturity, and therefor the equities pleaded can not avail the appellant. Besides, the account or indebtedness of the payee to the appellant in a suit pending on appeal, can not compensate the note held by the plaintiff, even though she acquired it after due.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyly, J.

In this suit on a promissory note, there was judgment against the maker thereof, J. Yiosca, Jr., and he has appealed. The plea of Ksjsendens is not well founded. The plaintiff is not shown to have acquired the note from the payee after maturity, and therefor the equities pleaded can not avail the appellant. Besides, the account or indebtedness of the payee to the appellant in a suit pending on appeal, can not compensate the note held by the plaintiff, even though she acquired it after due.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 La. Ann. 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-viosca-la-1874.