Woods v. State University of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Woods v. State University of New York

70 N.E.3d 477, 28 N.Y.3d 1140

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 2017·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Robert Rose (139 AD3d 1322, 1325 [2016]), and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Third Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that Court.

[1142] Concur: Chief Judge DiFioee and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia; Judge Wilson taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Robert Rose (139 AD3d 1322, 1325 [2016]), and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Third Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that Court.

[1142] Concur: Chief Judge DiFioee and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia; Judge Wilson taking no part.

Woods v. State University of New York, 70 N.E.3d 477, 28 N.Y.3d 1140 (N.Y. 2017).

Pincite

70 N.E.3d 477 (Woods v. State University of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related