Woods v. State
This text of 523 S.W.3d 537 (Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
James Woods appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Woods sought to vacate his convictions for two counts of first-degree burglary, one count of first-degree robbery, one count of second-degree robbery, and two counts of first degree elder abúse and cumulative sentences of 165 years imprisonment. He claims that he received ineffective assistance from trial and appellate counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
523 S.W.3d 537, 2017 WL 2640083, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-state-moctapp-2017.