Woods v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Woods v. State

936 S.W.2d 868, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 17, 1997 WL 3350

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 7, 1997

DocketNo. 70432

StatusPublished

This text of 936 S.W.2d 868 (Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woods v. State, 936 S.W.2d 868, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 17, 1997 WL 3350 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donnell Woods, Jr., (“Movant”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 75.01 motion which asked the court to reconsider its denial of his pro se petition for change of name under Supreme Court Rule 95. The State has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal contending that no appeal is possible from the denial of a Rule 75.01 motion. We agree. See State v. Sielfleisch, 884 S.W.2d 422, 431 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). We therefore order Movant’s appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donnell Woods, Jr., (“Movant”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 75.01 motion which asked the court to reconsider its denial of his pro se petition for change of name under Supreme Court Rule 95. The State has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal contending that no appeal is possible from the denial of a Rule 75.01 motion. We agree. See State v. Sielfleisch, 884 S.W.2d 422, 431 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). We therefore order Movant’s appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

936 S.W.2d 868, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 17, 1997 WL 3350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-state-moctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack