Woods v. State

132 S.E. 778, 35 Ga. App. 248, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 669
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1926
Docket17092
StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 778 (Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woods v. State, 132 S.E. 778, 35 Ga. App. 248, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction of violating the prohibition statute, and his criticism of the charge of the court is wholly without merit. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., not participating, on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 778, 35 Ga. App. 248, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-state-gactapp-1926.