Woods v. State

53 So. 3d 380, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 594, 2011 WL 249407
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 2011
DocketNo. 5D10-3672
StatusPublished

This text of 53 So. 3d 380 (Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woods v. State, 53 So. 3d 380, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 594, 2011 WL 249407 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PER CURIAM.

This Court issued a Spencer1 show cause order directing the Appellant, Carstarvos Woods, to demonstrate why he should not be barred from filing further pro se challenges to his convictions and sentences in this case. We did so after affirming the denial of Woods’ successive pro se motion [381]*381for postconviction relief — his sixth such motion since he was convicted eighteen years ago and his second since he was barred from further pro se filings by the trial court. We find Woods’ response to our show cause order to be unpersuasive and conclude he is abusing the judicial process.

Therefore, we now prohibit Woods from filing with this Court any more pro se pleadings concerning Hernando County, Fifth Judicial Circuit Court, case numbers 91-001-CF and 91-8B0-CF. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings from Woods concerning these cases. Any additional pleadings or motions in this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing with The Florida Bar. See Johnson v. State, 652 So.2d 980, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (prohibiting petitioner from filing further pro se pleadings after thirteen challenges to conviction and sentence); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2010); Simpkins v. State, 909 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isley v. State
652 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Johnson v. State
652 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Simpkins v. State
909 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 So. 3d 380, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 594, 2011 WL 249407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.