Woods v. State
This text of 802 So. 2d 1165 (Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, David Woods, appeals from an order denying hiá motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Although the defendant raises several issues, we find that the only one that has merit is the defendant’s claim that the trial court improperly precluded him from presenting evidence regarding his allegation of ineffective assistance of trial counsel arising from an undisclosed conflict. Accordingly, we reverse for a limited evi-dentiary hearing on that issue.
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
802 So. 2d 1165, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16647, 2001 WL 1502865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.