Woods v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Woods v. State

802 So. 2d 1165, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16647, 2001 WL 1502865

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Woods v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 740 So. 2d 20 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 2001·No. No. 3D00-3321·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, David Woods, appeals from an order denying hiá motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Although the defendant raises several issues, we find that the only one that has merit is the defendant’s claim that the trial court improperly precluded him from presenting evidence regarding his allegation of ineffective assistance of trial counsel arising from an undisclosed conflict. Accordingly, we reverse for a limited evi-dentiary hearing on that issue.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, David Woods, appeals from an order denying hiá motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Although the defendant raises several issues, we find that the only one that has merit is the defendant’s claim that the trial court improperly precluded him from presenting evidence regarding his allegation of ineffective assistance of trial counsel arising from an undisclosed conflict. Accordingly, we reverse for a limited evi-dentiary hearing on that issue.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Woods v. State, 802 So. 2d 1165, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16647, 2001 WL 1502865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

802 So. 2d 1165 (Woods v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.