Woods v. State
639 So. 2d 676, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6674, 1994 WL 316678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Woods v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 615 So. 2d 197 →
Opinion
In sentencing this juvenile as an adult, the trial court wrote a factual finding as to the sophistication and maturity of the defendant that stated as follows: “The sophistication and maturity of the child.” The state concedes that under Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993), the factual finding was insufficient to comply with section 39.-059(7)(c)4, Florida Statutes (1991). We reverse the sentence and remand for resen-tencing in compliance with section 39.-059(7) (c) as explained in Troutman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woods v. State, 639 So. 2d 676, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6674, 1994 WL 316678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
639 So. 2d 676 (Woods v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Troutman v. State
630 So. 2d 528 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)