Woods v. State

566 So. 2d 952, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7317, 1990 WL 139634
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Woods v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 542 So. 2d 443
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 1990·No. No. 89-2622·Published

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is the propriety of the guidelines departure sentence imposed after the defendant admitted violating his probation in Case No. 87-2582. The indicated guidelines sentence was 2½ to 3½ years’ imprisonment in the Department of Corrections. The court imposed a sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment, which represented a seven-cell increase from the recommended sentence. Because we now know that the trial court is limited to a one-cell “bump” when imposing a sentence after a violation of probation, we affirm the conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989).

[953]*953JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woods v. State, 566 So. 2d 952, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7317, 1990 WL 139634 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

566 So. 2d 952 (Woods v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lambert v. State
545 So. 2d 838 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)