Woods v. State

• Court: Supreme Court of Delaware
• Decided: June 17, 2020
• Docket: 64, 2020
• Status: Published

Opinion

4IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DANIEL M. WOODS, § § Defendant Below, § No. 64, 2020 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID Nos. 1701019682, § 1702009077, 1702009428 (N) Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: April 17, 2020 Decided: June 17, 2020

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs1 and the record on appeal, we

conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons

assigned by the Superior Court in its January 29, 2020 Order denying the appellant’s

first motion for postconviction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is GRANTED

and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice

1 The appellant’s motion to strike the appellee’s answering brief based on minor mistakes in the Table of Citations is denied. 2 State v. Woods, 2020 WL 491187 (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 29, 2020).