Woods v. State
This text of 205 S.W.3d 148 (Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Thomas B. Devine III, a full-time, state-salaried public defender for the Sixth Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant, Bryant Woods, an indigent defendant, on the charge of capital murder. Following a trial, he was convicted of the charge and was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. A notice of appeal was timely filed, and a request for the transcribed record has been timely lodged in this court.
Mr. Devine now moves to withdraw as counsel on appeal based upon Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), which held that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal. Since Rushing, the General Assembly has passed legislation providing that only those full-time, state-salaried public defenders who do not have state-funded secretaries may seek compensation for their work on appeal. See Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2003).
Mr. Devine states in his motion that he is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary who maintains his day-today office operations. Accordingly, we grant his motion to withdraw.
Mr. Brent Houston will be substituted as counsel for appellant in this matter. The Clerk will establish a new briefing schedule.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 S.W.3d 148, 361 Ark. 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-state-ark-2005.