Woods v. Sportonics Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Woods v. Sportonics Corp.

256 A.D.2d 404, 681 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13428

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 404 (Woods v. Sportonics Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woods v. Sportonics Corp., 256 A.D.2d 404, 681 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13428 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Murphy, J.), dated December 16, 1997, which granted the motion of the third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint on the ground that the oral agreement between the third-party [405]*405plaintiff and the third-party defendant violated the Statute of Frauds (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [5]; General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [1]). Miller, J. P., Copertino, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Murphy, J.), dated December 16, 1997, which granted the motion of the third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint on the ground that the oral agreement between the third-party [405]*405plaintiff and the third-party defendant violated the Statute of Frauds (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [5]; General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [1]). Miller, J. P., Copertino, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 404, 681 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-sportonics-corp-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack