Woods v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2010·No. 092270·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2270

JACQUELINE WOODS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CASSANDRA SMITH, Security Personnel; MICHAEL ADU; WILLIAM WASHINGTON, District Manager,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

JA-KIA ANTHONY, Human Resources,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00527-JCC-IDD)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacqueline Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Ramapuram, BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline Woods appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her action with prejudice for failure to state a

claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Woods v. Smith, No. 1:09-cv-00527-JCC-IDD (E.D.

Va. Oct. 6, 2009). Additionally, we deny Woods’s motion to

strike and motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woods v. Smith, (4th Cir. 2010).

Woods v. Smith (Woods v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.