Woods v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2270
JACQUELINE WOODS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CASSANDRA SMITH, Security Personnel; MICHAEL ADU; WILLIAM WASHINGTON, District Manager,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JA-KIA ANTHONY, Human Resources,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00527-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacqueline Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Ramapuram, BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Woods appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her action with prejudice for failure to state a
claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Woods v. Smith, No. 1:09-cv-00527-JCC-IDD (E.D.
Va. Oct. 6, 2009). Additionally, we deny Woods’s motion to
strike and motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woods v. Smith (Woods v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.