Woods v. Roberts
22 S.E. 986, 97 Ga. 254
Opinion
To a proceeding to foreclose a mortgage under the provisions of the pleading act of 1893, a plea of not indebted, though supplemented by the allegation that the mortgage “was obtained by fraud on the part of the plaintiff,” without alleging the particular fraudulent acts relied upon to defeat a recovery, is not such an issuable defense as prevents the granting of a rule absolute; and therefore the court did not err in striking such plea. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woods v. Roberts, 22 S.E. 986, 97 Ga. 254 (Ga. 1895).
22 S.E. 986 (Woods v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kent v. Rogers
200 S.E. 235 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Cook v. Cobb & Roper
95 S.E. 1022 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hicks v. Hamilton
59 S.E. 331 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Pyron & Son v. Ruohs
48 S.E. 434 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
De Soto Plantation Co. v. Hammett
36 S.E. 304 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)