Woods v. Oliver
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 DONTE WOODS, Case No. 2:23-cv-00991-ART-NJK 4 Petitioner, ORDER 5 v.
6 GABRIELA NAJERA, et al.,
7 Respondents.
8 9 In compliance with the Court’s prior order (ECF No. 3), petitioner, Donte 10 Woods, has paid the filing fee for his petition for a writ of habeas corpus 11 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 4. So, the Clerk of Court will be ordered 12 to docket the petition (ECF No. 1-1), the supporting exhibits (ECF No. 1-2), and 13 Woods’ motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-3). 14 In screening the petition under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas 15 Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 (“Habeas Rules”), the Court notes that 16 Woods used only a portion of the Court’s approved form. A petition for a writ of 17 habeas corpus filed by a person who is not represented by an attorney must be 18 on the form provided by this Court. LSR 3-1, Local Rules of Practice, U.S. 19 District Court of Nevada. The form, when fully completed, includes information 20 necessary for the Court to properly screen the petition in accordance with 21 Rule 4, such as whether the petition has been timely filed and whether the 22 petitioner has exhausted state court remedies before proceeding in federal 23 court. 24 Normally, the Court would require Woods to refile his petition in 25 compliance with LSR 3-1, but Woods has also submitted a motion for 26 appointment of counsel. Whenever the court determines that the interests of 27 justice so require, counsel may be appointed to any financially eligible person 28 who is seeking habeas corpus relief. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). Appointment in 1 the interests of justice is appropriate when the issues are complex and the 2 penalty is severe. See Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986). 3 Woods was convicted of attempted murder with use of a deadly weapon; battery 4 with use of a deadly weapon resulting in substantial bodily harm; discharging a 5 firearm at or into an occupied structure, vehicle, aircraft, or watercraft; 6 attempted invasion of the home with use of a deadly weapon; and attempted 7 burglary while in possession of a firearm.1 He is serving an aggregate sentence 8 of 10 to 40 years. His petition, which contains over a hundred pages of 9 handwritten claims, indicates that his case involves complex issues that require 10 the assistance of counsel to develop and articulate. Thus, the Court will grant 11 Woods’ motion for appointment of counsel. 12 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of Court detach and file 13 Woods’ petition for a writ of habeas (ECF No. 1-1), the supporting exhibits (ECF 14 No. 1-2), and Woods’ motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-3). 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk add Aaron D. Ford, Nevada 16 Attorney General, as counsel for respondents and provide respondents an 17 electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the 18 Notice of Electronic Filing to the office of the AG only. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Woods’ motion for appointment of 20 counsel is GRANTED. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender for the 22 District of Nevada (FPD) is appointed to represent Woods. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk ELECTRONICALLY SERVE 24 the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of 25 habeas corpus (ECF Nos. 1-1). The FPD has 30 days from the date of entry of 26
27 1 The Court takes judicial notice of the order affirming his judgment of conviction on direct appeal, which is available online. 28 https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseView.do?csIID=52040 1 || this order to file a notice of appearance or to indicate to the Court its inability to 2 || represent Woods in these proceedings. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after counsel has appeared for Woods in 4 || this case, the Court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other 5 || things, set a deadline for the filing of an amended petition. 6 DATED THIS 25 day of July, 2023. 7 Aras posed 8 ANNER TRAUM 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woods v. Oliver (Woods v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.