Woods v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Woods v. McCall

240 A.D.2d 839, 658 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6531

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 839 (Woods v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woods v. McCall, 240 A.D.2d 839, 658 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a correction officer at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County, was removing a prison inmate from his cell when the automatic cell gate stuck and did not open. Petitioner sustained a back injury while pulling on the cell gate in an attempt to open it. His subsequent application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied on the grounds that his back injury was caused by his physical exertion and emanated from a risk inherent in his duties and, therefore, was not caused by an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 605. As the record establishes that petitioner made the voluntary decision to pull on the gate in response to the malfunction of the automatic gate release, thereby precipitating his injury, we find that substantial evidence supports the determination that the injury to petitioner’s back did not constitute an accident (see, Matter of Caramante v Regan, 129 AD2d 850, 851-852, lv denied 69 NY2d 611; cf., Matter of Leuenberger v McCall, 235 AD2d 906, 907).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a correction officer at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County, was removing a prison inmate from his cell when the automatic cell gate stuck and did not open. Petitioner sustained a back injury while pulling on the cell gate in an attempt to open it. His subsequent application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied on the grounds that his back injury was caused by his physical exertion and emanated from a risk inherent in his duties and, therefore, was not caused by an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 605. As the record establishes that petitioner made the voluntary decision to pull on the gate in response to the malfunction of the automatic gate release, thereby precipitating his injury, we find that substantial evidence supports the determination that the injury to petitioner’s back did not constitute an accident (see, Matter of Caramante v Regan, 129 AD2d 850, 851-852, lv denied 69 NY2d 611; cf., Matter of Leuenberger v McCall, 235 AD2d 906, 907).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 839, 658 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-mccall-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack