Woods v. Jones
This text of 56 Ga. 520 (Woods v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The reporter’s statement will give the facts, and the head-notes the law, of this case. It will be noticed that the second hearing in the court below was not on exactly the same evidence as the first. < But without that difference, it would he the sounder ruling to hold, as we do, that a defect rendering a suitor’s title to a fund void, would not be presented too lale at any active stage of the case prior to its final disposition. Such an objection should be heeded so long as the fund in contest is within the power of the court, unless it has already been considered, and some direct ruling made upon it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 Ga. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-jones-ga-1876.