Woods v. Johnson & Smith

58 Ga. 138
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 Ga. 138 (Woods v. Johnson & Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woods v. Johnson & Smith, 58 Ga. 138 (Ga. 1877).

Opinion

Jackson, Judge.

In this case Johnson & Smith sued Woods in the county court, and an appeal was taken to the superior court. Woods moved to dismiss the case because the summons did not have annexed to it a copy of the account sued on. The [139]*139court refused to dismiss it, and the defendant excepted.

The Code declares that suits in the county courts should begin by summons as in justice courts, and in justice courts there is no provision of law that the copy of bill of particulars be attached to the summons. It is the better practice to do so; but it certainly would be amendable, to say the least, and the case should not have been dismissed. The defendant could have demanded the account if he wanted it, before pleading, and we cannot see how he is hurt. See Code, §§284, 285, 4139 et seq.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Wilson
61 Ga. 388 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Ga. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-johnson-smith-ga-1877.