Woods v. Inhabitants of Groton
111 Mass. 357
Opinion
The question is not whether the facts disclosed show that the arbitrators decided rightly; but whether they are sufficient to establish the contrary. Unless it is made to appear that the arbitrators mistook the law, or misconducted in some respect, their award cannot be set aside. All presumptions are to be taken in its favor; and it is conclusive upon questions of fact. c
There is nothing in the case by which the award can be impeached. Judgment for the plaintiffs affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woods v. Inhabitants of Groton, 111 Mass. 357 (Mass. 1873).
111 Mass. 357 (Woods v. Inhabitants of Groton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Vincennes v. Spees
74 N.E. 277 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)
Earl v. City of Cedar Rapids
102 N.W. 140 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
Card v. City of Ellsworth
65 Me. 547 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1876)