Woods v. Gibson

6 Johns. 125
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Though the late sheriff went out of office after the jury were summoned, and before the return day of the venire, and though it was not actually delivered to him, we think he is entitled to the fees for summoning the jury, but not the nine cents for returning the venire, as that service was* in fact, performed by his successor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woods v. Gibson, 6 Johns. 125 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

6 Johns. 125 (Woods v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calloway v. Willie's Lessee
10 Tenn. 1 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1820)