Woods v. Forsyth

30 F. Cas. 533, 2 West. Jur. 348
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1868·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court has not concurrent original jurisdiction giren it by the bankrupt act [of 1867 (14 Stat. 517)] for the collection of the debts due the bankrupt, and the settlement of his estate. The concurrent jurisdiction conferred by the second section of the act is confined to cases in which there is a disputed title or claim to property; to suits in which some title or claim to the property or assets adverse to that of assignee is set up. As this court has no jurisdiction, the suit will be dismissed without passing upon the demurrers. Suit dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woods v. Forsyth, 30 F. Cas. 533, 2 West. Jur. 348 (circtdmo 1868).

30 F. Cas. 533 (Woods v. Forsyth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.