Woods v. Dill

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 108, 1 Cole. Cas. 106
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1800
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 108 (Woods v. Dill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woods v. Dill, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 108, 1 Cole. Cas. 106 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defect of the process was the plaintiff’s mistake, and the defendant was certainly under no obligation to go to trial on it, nor had the plaintiff any right to demand it of him.

Let the defendant take the effect of his motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 108, 1 Cole. Cas. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-dill-nysupct-1800.