Woods v. County of Wilson

578 F. App'x 200
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 2014
DocketNo. 13-7970
StatusPublished

This text of 578 F. App'x 200 (Woods v. County of Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woods v. County of Wilson, 578 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Isaac Lee Woods appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the court’s orders and the record and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woods v. County of Wilson, No. 5:10-ct-03118-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2014). Insofar as the court dismissed the complaint without prejudice against Wake County and the Wake County Defendants for failing to exhaust administrative remedies, even if the Defendants failed to show that Woods had available administrative remedies that he failed to utilize, we affirm on the basis that Woods failed to state a claim against those Defendants. See Ellis v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., 699 F.3d 778, 786-87 (4th Cir.2012) (this court may affirm on alternate grounds). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bianca Ellis v. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
699 F.3d 778 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 F. App'x 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-county-of-wilson-ca4-2014.