Woods v. Commissioners of Van Buren County

1 Morris 441
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided January 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Br the Court,

Wilson, Justice.

The agreement of the parties that the jury, after agreeing to a verdict, might seal the same and sepa» rate, and to receive the verdict of the eleven jurors was a waiver of all exceptions because of such separation, and placed the cause in the same situation as though the twelve jurors had delivered it. Piad the twelve jurors delivered it, no one would question the authority of the court to direct them to retire and put it in proper form. The statute authorizes the court itself to put verdicts in proper form. As there is no complaint of improper conduct on the part of the jurors, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woods v. Commissioners of Van Buren County, 1 Morris 441 (iowa 1845).

1 Morris 441 (Woods v. Commissioners of Van Buren County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rutledge v. Johnson
282 N.W.2d 111 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1979)
Reece v. Knott
3 Utah 451 (Utah Supreme Court, 1861)