WOODS v. CENTURION
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
DANNIS C. WOODS,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 4:25-cv-237-TKW-MAF
CENTURION, et al.,
Defendants. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). No objections were filed.1 Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed under the “three-strikes statute,” 28 U.S.C. §1915(g), and as “malicious” based on Plaintiff’s failure to fully disclose his litigation history, see Burrell v. Warden, 857 F. App’x 624, 625 (11th Cir. 2021) (“An action is malicious when a prisoner misrepresents his prior litigation history on a complaint form
1 Plaintiff filed several documents after the Report and Recommendation was issued, see Docs. 5, 6, 7, 8, but those documents were largely incomprehensible and did not take issue with any of the analysis in the Report and Recommendation. To the extent those documents requested any affirmative relief, it is denied. Page 1 of 2 requiring disclosure of such history and signs the complaint under penalty of perjury, as such a complaint is an abuse of the judicial process.”). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. $1915(g) and §1915(e)(2)(B)(@). 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of June, 2025.
Tho Wo fe
T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WOODS v. CENTURION (WOODS v. CENTURION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.