Woods v. Berryhill
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
VINETTA WOODS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:18 CV 1431 CDP ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Vinetta Woods prevailed on her appeal for judicial review of an adverse decision of the Social Security Administration and now requests attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of $5,115.00. The Commissioner does not object to plaintiff’s request for fees and asks that I order payment in the amount requested. I will grant the request. This matter came before me on plaintiff’s appeal for judicial review of an adverse decision of the Social Security Administration. In a Memorandum, Order, and Judgment entered September 3, 2019, I reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff now seeks an award of attorney’s fees inasmuch as she is a prevailing party, has a net worth of less than two million dollars, and incurred these fees in this action. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Commissioner does not oppose plaintiff's motion but requests that
any award be made payable in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). Upon review of plaintiff’s motion and the Commissioner’s response, I find the requested fees and the Commissioner’s requested terms of payment to be reasonable. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs Petition to Award Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act [22] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), plaintiff shall recover attorney’s fees from the Social Security Administration in the amount of Five Thousand, One Hundred Fifteen 00/100 Dollars ($5,115.00). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, under the terms of the Assignment of EAJA Fee executed by the plaintiff in this case (see ECF 22-3), the award shall be made payable to Parmele Law Firm, P.C., unless plaintiff has a pre-existing debt
owed to the United States, in which case the award shall be made payable to the plaintiff and subject to offset to satisfy that debt.
dbo. CMTE D PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 20th day of November, 2019. -2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woods v. Berryhill (Woods v. Berryhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.