Woods v. Adams
This text of 698 F. App'x 528 (Woods v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
1. The district court didn’t err by finding that Woods failed to show “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This case is unlike Williams v. Paramo, wheré the prisoner alleged actual threats of violence. See 775 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2015).
2. We grant Woods’s first three motions for judicial notice and deny his fourth motion for judicial notice. Fed. R. Evid. 201(b).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
698 F. App'x 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-adams-ca9-2017.