Wood's Estate

57 A. 1103, 209 Pa. 16, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 544
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 11, 1904
DocketAppeal, No. 69
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 57 A. 1103 (Wood's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood's Estate, 57 A. 1103, 209 Pa. 16, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 544 (Pa. 1904).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned judge of the court below in speaking of the interpretation to be put upon a general residuary clause in a will says:

“ The foundation of this general rule in respect of lapsed [19]*19legacies it is said in 2 Williams on Executors, 1569, is that the residuary clause is understood to be intended to embrace everything not otherwise effectually given; because the testator is supposed to “ take the particular legacy away from the residuary legatee, only for the sake of the particular legatee; so that upon failure of the particular intent-the court gives effect to the general intent.”

This of itself would be ample authority in vindication of the decree if we had no more. The decree is affirmed on the opinion of the court below and the appeal dismissed at costs of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kynett Estate
72 Pa. D. & C.2d 253 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1975)
Suter Estate
47 Pa. D. & C.2d 270 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1969)
Kershow Estate
40 Pa. D. & C.2d 237 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1966)
Pavlinko Will
148 A.2d 528 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Heilman Estate
13 Pa. D. & C.2d 440 (Lehigh County Orphans' Court, 1958)
Cryder v. Garrison
128 A.2d 761 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Jull Estate
88 A.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Yeisley Estate
56 A.2d 205 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Myers v. Smith
16 N.W.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1944)
Suttner Estate
34 A.2d 483 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Armstrong Estate
31 A.2d 528 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Haak's Estate
18 A.2d 671 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Darr's Estate
39 Pa. D. & C. 210 (Allegheny County Orphans' Court, 1940)
Carson's Estate
196 A. 527 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Denny's Estate
22 Pa. D. & C. 175 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1934)
Mervine's Estate
19 Pa. D. & C. 528 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1933)
Adams's Estate
11 Pa. D. & C. 644 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1929)
Karolusson v. Paonessa
222 N.W. 431 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1928)
Patterson v. Reed
103 A. 735 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Beidler v. Dehner
178 Iowa 1338 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A. 1103, 209 Pa. 16, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-estate-pa-1904.