Woodruff v. State

916 S.W.2d 104, 323 Ark. 448, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 89
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 12, 1996
DocketCR 96-90
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 916 S.W.2d 104 (Woodruff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodruff v. State, 916 S.W.2d 104, 323 Ark. 448, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 89 (Ark. 1996).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Darren Woodruff, by his attorney, Maxie G. Kizer, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The Clerk refused to docket the record concerning Mr. Wood-ruff s conviction because it revealed that the notice of appeal was late. We treat the motion for rule on the clerk as a motion for belated appeal in this circumstance.

Failure of counsel to perfect an appeal for a defendant who wishes to appeal constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel, and good cause for granting a belated appeal pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.9(e).

A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. State
57 S.W.3d 178 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
916 S.W.2d 104, 323 Ark. 448, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodruff-v-state-ark-1996.