Woodruff v. State

916 S.W.2d 104, 323 Ark. 448, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 89
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 12, 1996·No. CR 96-90·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Darren Woodruff, by his attorney, Maxie G. Kizer, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The Clerk refused to docket the record concerning Mr. Wood-ruff s conviction because it revealed that the notice of appeal was late. We treat the motion for rule on the clerk as a motion for belated appeal in this circumstance.

Failure of counsel to perfect an appeal for a defendant who wishes to appeal constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel, and good cause for granting a belated appeal pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.9(e).

A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodruff v. State, 916 S.W.2d 104, 323 Ark. 448, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 89 (Ark. 1996).

916 S.W.2d 104 (Woodruff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. State
57 S.W.3d 178 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2001)