Woodruff v. Sinclair Refining Co.
259 A.D. 788, 19 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6649
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent to abide the event. Memorandum: We affirm the order in the interest of substantial justice and not for the reasons stated in the decision of the Special Term. All concur. (The order sets aside the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff and grants a new trial in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by (-reason of falling into an unguarded pit in a gasoline station.) Present —■ Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and MeCum, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodruff v. Sinclair Refining Co., 259 A.D. 788, 19 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
259 A.D. 788 (Woodruff v. Sinclair Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.