Woodruff v. New-York & New-Haven Railroad

18 How. Pr. 419
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJanuary 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 18 How. Pr. 419 (Woodruff v. New-York & New-Haven Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodruff v. New-York & New-Haven Railroad, 18 How. Pr. 419 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1860).

Opinion

Woodruff, Justice.

If the principles declared in the only opinion which was delivered in the court of appeals, in the [421]*421case of the Mechanics' Bank against the present defendants (3 Kernan's Rep. 599), are applied in their full extent to this case, I have not been able to avoid the conclusion that the defendants should have judgment, and whatever may be my opinion, uninfluenced by that decision, I do not feel at liberty to say that the court of appeals do not intend to hold all of the propositions, which are there stated, as reasons for the judgment given.

After full reflection and examination of the cases cited, it appears to be most conformable to what is fitting and proper to find the facts proved, apply to them the principles declared in the case referred to, and leave the plaintiffs to resort to the court of appeals itself, if the plaintiffs believe that the circumstances, which, in many important particulars, distinguish this case from the other, will in the judgment of that tribunal, entitle the plaintiffs to recover.

I am satisfied that I cannot assign reasons for a judgment for the plaintiffs, which are satisfactory to my own mind, without conflicting with the opinion of the court of last resort.

I therefore direct judgment herein for the defendants, with costs to the defendants, The New-York and Mew-Haven Railroad Company, who have appeared and answered herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 How. Pr. 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodruff-v-new-york-new-haven-railroad-nysuperctnyc-1860.