Woodruff v. Hill
116 Mass. 310, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 94
Opinion
The note was made in Massachusetts, and the contract of the makers with the payees and with any indorsee thereof was to be performed here, and governed by our law. Story Confl. Laws, §§ 317, 344, 345. By that law, the facts offered to be proved at the trial constituted no defence. Blanchard v. Stevens, 3 Cush. 162. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodruff v. Hill, 116 Mass. 310, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 94 (Mass. 1874).
116 Mass. 310 (Woodruff v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allied Furriers Corp. v. Lisker
138 N.E. 571 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Limerick National Bank v. Howard
51 A. 641 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1901)
Wylie v. Cotter
49 N.E. 746 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Lockwood v. Lindsey
6 App. D.C. 396 (D.C. Circuit, 1895)
Pope v. Hanke
28 L.R.A. 568 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1894)
Gilman Bros. v. Stevens
1 A. 202 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1885)