Woodrow v. Frederick

131 S.E. 598, 133 S.C. 431, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 113
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 25, 1926
Docket11899
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 131 S.E. 598 (Woodrow v. Frederick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodrow v. Frederick, 131 S.E. 598, 133 S.C. 431, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 113 (S.C. 1926).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

The decree of his Honor, Judge Townsend, is entirely satisfactory.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Mr. Justice Marion and Mr. Acting Associate Justice R. O. Purdy concur. Mr. Justice Watts and Mr. Acting Associate Justice C. J. RamagE dissent. Mr. Chief Justice Gary did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Commerce of Charlotte v. Waters
56 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)
Mills v. Commissioner
11 T.C. 25 (U.S. Tax Court, 1948)
In re McElmurray
47 F. Supp. 15 (E.D. South Carolina, 1942)
Dangerfield v. Brown
186 S.E. 641 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936)
Tunkle v. Padgett
158 S.E. 693 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Bank of Charleston v. Oates
158 S.E. 272 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Ives v. Rutland
133 S.E. 539 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 598, 133 S.C. 431, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodrow-v-frederick-sc-1926.