Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/Woodrow v. Frederick

Woodrow v. Frederick

131 S.E. 598, 133 S.C. 431, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 113
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 25, 1926·No. 11899·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

The decree of his Honor, Judge Townsend, is entirely satisfactory.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Mr. Justice Marion and Mr. Acting Associate Justice R. O. Purdy concur. Mr. Justice Watts and Mr. Acting Associate Justice C. J. RamagE dissent. Mr. Chief Justice Gary did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodrow v. Frederick, 131 S.E. 598, 133 S.C. 431, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 113 (S.C. 1926).

131 S.E. 598 (Woodrow v. Frederick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Commerce of Charlotte v. Waters
56 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)
Mills v. Commissioner
11 T.C. 25 (U.S. Tax Court, 1948)
In re McElmurray
47 F. Supp. 15 (E.D. South Carolina, 1942)
Dangerfield v. Brown
186 S.E. 641 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936)
Tunkle v. Padgett
158 S.E. 693 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Bank of Charleston v. Oates
158 S.E. 272 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Ives v. Rutland
133 S.E. 539 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)