Woodrow v. Fitz Bros.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Woodrow v. Fitz Bros.

91 A. 1067, 112 Me. 558, 1914 Me. LEXIS 110

DecidedAugust 28, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A. 1067 (Woodrow v. Fitz Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodrow v. Fitz Bros., 91 A. 1067, 112 Me. 558, 1914 Me. LEXIS 110 (Me. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

No exceptions to the admission or exclusion of evidence or to any part of the charge of the presiding Justice are presented, and the parties do not disagree as to the principles of law which obtain in the case. The verdict rests upon questions of pure fact and of such a nature as to be peculiarly within the province of the jury to finally decide. We discover no error in the result -reached by that branch of the Court. Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No exceptions to the admission or exclusion of evidence or to any part of the charge of the presiding Justice are presented, and the parties do not disagree as to the principles of law which obtain in the case. The verdict rests upon questions of pure fact and of such a nature as to be peculiarly within the province of the jury to finally decide. We discover no error in the result -reached by that branch of the Court. Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A. 1067, 112 Me. 558, 1914 Me. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodrow-v-fitz-bros-me-1914.