Woodrow Nor Woods, Applicant v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, San Quentin, California

221 F.2d 556, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3540
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 1955
Docket432_1
StatusPublished

This text of 221 F.2d 556 (Woodrow Nor Woods, Applicant v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, San Quentin, California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodrow Nor Woods, Applicant v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, San Quentin, California, 221 F.2d 556, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3540 (9th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

221 F.2d 556

Woodrow Nor WOODS, Applicant,
v.
Harley O. TEETS, Warden, San Quentin, California, Respondent.

Misc. No. 432.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

April 21, 1955.

Woodrow Nor Woods, San Quentin, Cal., in pro. per., for applicant.

No appearance for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge.

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

Applicant seeks a certificate of probable cause to appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. The order was entered February 8, 1955, and the District Court denied a certificate of probable cause.

The application was not received by this court until after the time in which to take an appeal had run and is ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woods v. Teets
221 F.2d 556 (Ninth Circuit, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 F.2d 556, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodrow-nor-woods-applicant-v-harley-o-teets-warde-ca9-1955.