Woodring v. Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co.

302 U.S. 658, 58 S. Ct. 365
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 20, 1937·No. No. 39·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Certiorari, 301 U. S. 679, to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the petitioners to reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, with instructions to dismiss the bill, is granted, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the bill of complaint upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216, 217, 218; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528, 535, 536; Bracken v. Securities & Exchange Comm’n, 299 U. S. 504.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodring v. Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co., 302 U.S. 658, 58 S. Ct. 365 (1937).

302 U.S. 658 (Woodring v. Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boggess v. Berry Corporation
233 F.2d 389 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
Boggess ex rel. City of Fairbanks v. Berry Corp.
233 F.2d 389 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
340 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1950)